By teaching our students to think, care, and act, we empower them to build a peaceful future.


Welcome to Think, Care, Act, where teachers and students can find rationales and resources to infuse required curricula with peace, character, global, and multicultural concepts throughout the year.

To act in a world whose problems seem overwhelming requires being able to use the powers of critical and creative thinking and compassionate and inclusive care. Employing these tools, adults and youth alike can work effectively and conscientiously to solve problems big and small, global and local.

Showing posts with label critical thinking. Show all posts
Showing posts with label critical thinking. Show all posts

Monday, September 2, 2013

TEACHING TO CHANGE THE WORLD: A VETERAN TEACHER’S GOALS FOR A NEW SCHOOL YEAR

As the new school year begins, I continue to share the overarching goal of my favorite historian and educator, Howard Zinn: “I had a modest goal when I became a teacher… I wanted to change the world.” 

To act in a world whose problems seem overwhelming requires being able to use the powers of critical and creative thinking and compassionate and inclusive care.  Employing these tools, adults and youth alike can effectively and conscientiously solve problems big and small, global and local.  When students treat each other compassionately, accept each other’s mistakes with grace, curiously and respectfully engage with the wider world, and are thoughtful in all senses of the word, I feel uplifted.  I believe in the power of learning to think, care, and act, and that belief drives me to be the best teacher I can be.

So how do I approach the classroom in September after more than thirty years of teaching?  How will I keep my teaching fresh, innovative, and relevant?  How will I remember my character, multicultural, global, social-justice, and peace teaching priorities?  I set goals for myself as a teacher, colleague, and family member.




My Goals and Action Steps:

I teach in a suburban middle school setting.  I have a homeroom and advisory, and I teach English, history, and various electives.  My school has sufficient materials and support to allow my goals to be flexible and expansive.  Perhaps they are relevant to a variety of teaching situations as well.



1. Empower students to understand and use their capacity to change the world for the better—from their classroom interactions to their action in the community and wider world. 

  • Continue to experiment in all classes with Freirean teaching strategies in which students construct their own knowledge.  Work to enhance students’ ability to think, care, act—for their own growth and the greater good.
  • Make classroom inviting, warm, and fun: bulletin boards, class atmosphere, projects led by students, willingness to take tangents, etc.
  • Interact with students in a way that makes them feel nurtured and challenged, safe and able to take risks.  Laugh with them.  Be “slow to chide and quick to bless.”  Share my mistakes, and model learning from them.
  • Build teamwork with colleagues and undertake experiments together.

2. Communicate caringly and effectively with advisee students and families.  Be “slow to chide and quick to bless.”
  • Touch base daily with advisees and have individual conferences with each advisee once per trimester at recess or lunch.
  • Help parents embrace and enhance their roles in their children’s learning and development as people.  Share personal examples.
  • Email advisee families at least once per month with updates and anecdotes about advisory discussions and school life.  Include pictures.

3. HISTORY CLASSES: Convey to students that history is the story of choices made by ordinary people, every day.
  • Emphasize the “bright-spot,” peace aspects of cultures rather than focusing on wars: literature, science, agriculture, trade, family structure, arts, religion, etc.
  • Help students weave their own connections and among cultures studied.
  • Emphasize empathy.  Encourage them to wonder, “What would it have been like to have been those people?”
  • Encourage them to ask “What if?” questions about history.

4. ENGLISH CLASSES: Convey to students that reading literature and writing personal narratives are ways to communicate the similarities and differences that bind us as a classroom and human family.
  • Make the classroom safe for students to explore their feelings and insights and to share them without fear of ridicule.
  • Help students imagine a future in which they want to live, dealing with specifics raised by such novels as The Giver and Roll of Thunder, Hear my Cry as well as current local and global events about which they are concerned or curious.
  • Help students appreciate their similarities and differences from characters in literature and classmates.  Emphasize empathy. Encourage them to wonder, “What is it like to be that person?”
  • Help them weave connections between themselves and others in the classroom and global communities through writing, talking, reading, and listening.

5. Convey rationales and resources for character, global, and peace education to colleagues, peer teachers, and pre-service teachers via book, blog, workshops, and webpage.
  • Update blog twice per month.
  • Present teacher workshops each year, locally, nationally, and internationally.
  • Develop and present teaching workshops and university class.

6. Balance personal, school, and professional life in a healthful and mindful manner.
  • Spend 5/6th of creative/constructive time in school teaching, interacting, and developing innovations with students, colleagues, and families. 
  • Limit computer tech trouble-shooting and minutia-work on hardware/software issues to 1/6th of creative/constructive time in school.
  • Schedule daily and/or weekly trips to connect with family members.
  • Spend time in nature daily.  Walk daily. 
  • Take care of inner life: breathe and smile.

Background:
The expertise I have gained and the willingness to experiment I have developed are aspects of my teaching that I now share with other teachers in local, national, and international workshops and in my book, blog, and article writing.   These aspects revolve around skills and beliefs held by many veteran teachers: the power of students’ own thoughts and interests, the importance of building relationships, the need to involve families, the ability to teach and reach every child.  But a different drummer beats in my heart each day as I head to my classroom: the necessity I feel for being (like Dr. King) “a drum major for peace.” 

We live in a world in which the prevailing paradigm is that war is inevitable and that much violence is acceptable.  I want to introduce students, colleagues, and families to the well-supported notion that peacebuilding is possible and effective: in our daily interactions in class and at play, in our homes and communities, and among nations of the world.  I want students to experience becoming peacebuilders in their peer groups.  I want to introduce them to historical and current events in which active nonviolence overcame injustice and violence.  I want to empower them to use such techniques to change the world for the better. 

Where does this drum-major-for-peace mentality originate?

From my earliest memories, I see images of my father in uniform.  There were the tiny photographs (fading even in my childhood) that he shot in Italy in World War II.  In my memory, I hear the stories, often funny, of how he and a buddy jumped into a pigpen under orders to take cover, of stringing wire on a telephone pole as his jeep buddies sped away under German fire.  My father told these stories over and over again, and they always ended with his loud belly laughs, as if he were trying to persuade us that the war had been fun.

But, I also hear the screaming. My father screamed in his sleep often, sometimes nightly.

After my father’s death, I asked my mother, “How did Dad go through all he did and still carry on a normal life?”  “He fought the war every night for sixty years,” Mom replied, and turned away.  He wasn’t alone.  Millions of veterans of combat, soldier and civilian alike, are living with the demons of war both in their daily lives and in their nightmares.  And every day, in numerous countries around the world, more men, women, and children are becoming living and dead casualties of war, military and civilian alike.

As a daughter, a sister, a wife, a mother, and a teacher (and now a grandmother), I question why we allow this as a global society.  I have not raised my two sons to kill other mothers’ sons.  I am not teaching my students so they can kill the students of other teachers.  In my classroom, I want to create a culture of peace, and it my sincere hope that my students will be among those who build a peaceful future.

Committed to teaching for peace and justice, I envision peace education as an umbrella, encompassing education’s best efforts to empower youth to change the world for the better: critical and creative thinking education, civics education, character and moral education, multicultural and antibias education, gender-equity education, conflict resolution and antiviolence education, social justice and global education, service learning, environmental education, and 21st century education to name major strands of teaching for the greater good.

How does this “umbrella” look in my classroom?  I use a teaching approach that empowers youth:
• to think critically and creatively about historical, current, and future issues,
• to care about classmates and neighbors as well as the global community,
• to act—locally and globally—for the greater good.

 I ask students to develop what scholar Noam Chomsky calls “intellectual self defense” when facing information in textbooks, primary sources, and newspapers; when evaluating information conveyed by teachers, parents, politicians, and others in authority; and when consuming every kind of online media message. Students also use imagination and creative thinking about the past, present, and future to help envision and create the future in which they want to live.  Creative thinking in history and literature projects also allows students to imagine how others feel and helps them step into the metaphorical shoes of their classmates and international peers.  Thus, my classroom is often noisy, with students working in pairs or groups to critically and creatively think together.  I partner students with different learning styles and strengths to help them learn to appreciate different ways of tackling projects and problems.  Formal and informal debates happen often, and students learn that I value their opinions—even if they differ from mine.  Cooperative learning happens daily.

What does it mean to care for the local and global “other” in a society whose constant message is it’s all about me?  First, I encourage students to respect, care for, and appreciate the people around them, from family to peers and teachers. Knowing how to make others feel safe and welcome is a prerequisite for living and working effectively and collegially with others—in and out of the classroom. Second, I help students widen their circles of care to include people in their neighborhood, country, and wider world.  Thus, in my classroom, we spend time getting to know each other deeply, through sharing personal writing and photographs, through projects about our families and backgrounds, by listening to each other, and by making our classroom a safe place to make mistakes and learn from them together.  We pay attention to language.  We use put-ups, not put-downs.  I stop class to reset the tone of our conversations when necessary.  We also widen our world by discussing current global events, reading global poetry, studying global trade, and even exchanging poetry and dreams with students across the world.

Finally, I try to inspire students to act. Using the examples of problem solvers in our neighborhoods and on the world stage, I try to teach students to identify issues about which they care, examine the root causes, and design and implement actions to improve life for people, animals, and the environment. In advisory, English, American History, Debate, Model UN/PeaceJam, and Student Council, I encourage students to develop their own tools—as individuals and groups—to deal with the problems that face us all on an exploding and warming planet. Students can begin to build a peaceful future one step at a time if we teach them how to do so.


Goal setting can be inspiring.  It can keep us honest.  Have a great year in your classroom by taking time to set the direction you want your teaching to be headed.  Selected resources are below.  These link to many other useful social justice, peace, character, multicultural, and social-action education resources.

(Original artwork by J. Kadir Cannon: www.jkadircannon.com)


Saturday, August 4, 2012

Thinking the Olympics


I’ll admit that my hopes for a peaceful future get fired up during the Olympics.  I am a fan of the accomplishments and striving of each generation of athletes who gather in an Olympic Village to compete.  I’m also a fan of the idea that people all over the world pause to appreciate and cheer for them.  Yes, I know the games are commercialized, controversies abound, and media coverage—in every country—often tends to promote nationalism versus a sense of global community.  I still love the Games.

I also love the opportunities Olympics' issues offer to thoughtful teachers and students.  Here are ways to continue the excitement of the games in the classroom, with an eye to enhancing critical thinking, media literacy, discussion of human rights, and appreciation of sportsmanship and athleticism.


Look at nationalism versus global unity: 

Colman McCarthy is one of my heroes.  Former Washington Post journalist McCarthy details his transition to peace educator in his 2002 book I’d Rather Teach Peace.  He directs the Center for Teaching Peace, and if you don’t know of McCarthy’s work, please visit the links below.  Perhaps he points to the need for peace education best by asserting “Unless we teach our children peace, somebody else will teach them violence.”

In 2006, McCarthy wrote an article entitled The Olympics are too Politicized, describing the career and critical thinking of 1990s Olympic speed skater Nathanial Mills.  Mills valued the games—as many of us do—as an opportunity for internationalism and the way they bring athletes and spectators together in pursuit of and appreciation of excellence.  However, McCarthy wrote, Mills began to look at the Olympics with a more critical eye:

It was only after he retired from competition that Mr. Mills saw how nationalism and pseudopatriotism degraded the Olympics. Why, he wondered, are national flags raised at the medal ceremonies? Why are national anthems played?
If the Games become contests between hired gladiators of various nations with the idea of building national prestige or proving that one system of government or other is better than another, they will have lost all purpose.
"The simplest way to de-nationalize the medal ceremony," Mr. Mills believes, "is to raise the Olympic flag and sound an Olympic anthem when awarding the winner. The Olympic flag, representing the continents on which humanity resides and not the nation-states artificially created upon them, has become one of the most recognized positive symbols on the planet. A denationalized ceremony would simply recognize the accomplishment of the winner—and all competitors—as a victory for humankind, giving everyone cause to say, 'That is one of our own….'"
McCarthy continues:
At the 2002 winter games in Salt Lake City, where he spoke as a representative of the U.S. Athletic Commission, Mr. Mills expressed those views. He was rebuked as a dreamer, an agitator and an unpatriotic nag….
Such thinking is beyond the executives of NBC, the Olympic broadcaster providing coverage—if past performance means anything—gushingly pro-American. NBC might as well become the Nationalistic Broadcasting Company….
Think about media coverage with your students.  Have they thought about the nationalism versus patriotism versus internationalism concepts Mills and McCarthy raise?  Probably not. 
  • Classroom activity to promote media literacy and a discussion of the nationalism factor of the Olympics: Invite students to browse lead stories from an international array of news sources during the time period of the 2012 Olympic Games.  Assign pairs of students to work in teams to represent different countries.  Ask them to count mentions of “their” country’s athletes versus those of other countries on “frontpage” headlines.  (See the link below to REFDESK, a compendium of national and international online newspapers.)  Follow with a discussion of Mills's suggestion of abandoning national flag ceremonies for Olympic flag ceremonies.  I can guarantee an engaging debate on the symbolic nature of national and international flags, media focus, and the role of the Olympics in international life.
Think about human rights and the Olympics:

While McCarthy decries the over-politicization of the Olympics, many wonder why certain issues are not discussed.  Which countries encourage women to compete?  Where are women’s rights discouraged?  What are the economic barriers to athletes and families?  Which countries support athletic development.  Is that support “fair?”  What is the role of the Olympian as role model?  Does an athlete on the global stage have a duty to speak out against human rights abuses in his/her country?  What happens to athletes who go “out of bounds” to bring such questions to the fore? 
In the 1968 example of U.S. gold medalist Tommie Smith and bronze medalist John Carlos, their demonstration against racism and poverty caused immediate controversy.  Most of our students have not heard of Olympians Smith and Carlos.  They should know what they did on the medal stand—and more importantly—why.
  • Classroom activity to discuss the 1968 Mexico Olympic Award Ceremony in which U.S. gold medalist Tommie Smith and bronze medalist John Carlos raised fists on the podium to bring attention to human rights issues.  Watch several minutes of the Democracy Now recap of the race and ceremony (and a compelling interview with Juan Carlos in 2011).  Have students read Dave Zirin’s Fists of Freedom article.   Pose the following questions for your students: Is it appropriate for an Olympian to use the award pedestal to make a statement about human rights in his/her country?  Would the American media applaud a Chinese athlete who did this today?  Did the raised-fist athletes disgrace or enhance the image of the United States?  What happened to the careers of these athletes compared to their peers?  Who supported these athletes’ stands?  Why?  These and other questions will engage your students in active thinking about the roles of athletes and the Olympics.
Think about questions of disability versus ability and the example of Oscar Pistorius:  

Colleague Matt Newcomb and I involve our 7th and 8th grade debate class students in this topic with a debate of the appropriateness of runner Oscar Pistorius competing in the Olympics.  What’s the controversy?  Pistorius is a double amputee from the knee down.  Nicknamed “The Bladerunner,” Pistorius runs with prosthetic limbs—spring-like devices that have some commentators crying unfair advantage.  Others applaud the resilience of Pistorius, born without bones in his lower legs, to have made such strides in the demanding sport.   Denied permission to compete in the 2008 Beijing Games, Pistorius ran in London in 2012.  I cried as I watched him run. 
  • Classroom activity: Invite students to read the Christian Science Monitor article about the Pistorius controversy.  Let them watch YouTube videos of on-street interviews and his competitions.  Using such resources, invite students to record pros and cons of allowing athletes with prosthetic devices to compete against so-called “able-bodied” athletes.  (Debate that term as well!)  In addition to the critical thinking that will result, awareness of disability rights is but one outcome of this activity.
Think about sportsmanship and the Games:

Is it wrong to conserve energy in one race to more effectively compete in another?  Can one fairly fall down after starting a race to ensure a better re-start?  Should a team “throw” a qualifying match to pull an easier opponent on the way to the medal stand?  These are questions raised in the 2012 Olympics that will surely engage students.  The most visible occurrence of such strategy was in the badminton qualifying rounds, where top teams were judged to be playing poorly to fare better against easier opponents later in the competition.  Eight Olympic badminton players were eliminated from the Games.  But some highly decorated Olympians admit to reserving energy in one race to better compete later.  Is this unsportsmanlike behavior?
  • Classroom activity: The questions raised in the Los Angeles Times article (and online videos) will fuel formal debates and informal discussions in your classroom.  Consider such questions as the following: What is the role of sportsmanship in the Olympics?  What is the role of sportsmanship at our school?  Does our school have a “win at all costs” culture?  Is it cheating if you don’t try your best?  Should all students have the opportunity to play some sport during the school day?  Are some sports valued more highly than others?  Why?  Who benefits from the popularity of sports in our culture?  Your students will take over this discussion, raising numerous issues of personal and school relevance.
The wrap up: Regardless of where you stand on the Olympics, they offer opportunities for us to teach students to think critically.  Watching how we watch the Olympics—as citizens of one country or a global family (or both?), evaluating the role of Olympic athletes in consciousness raising, discussing the meaning of able-bodiedness, and bringing questions of sportsmanship from the Olympics to students’ personal lives are valuable ways for us to change watching the Olympics to thinking the Olympics.
Links to resources: